2 Took Cash, 1 Took Stock

Have you heard of this story? A lot of us, young business students, studied this riddle throughout school. The simple story goes on to tell how one of the children earned more money, compared to the other two, because that person chose stock.

It teaches us a lot about business, and how it all formed. This taught us why there are so many families, with different jobs and careers. The simple domino effect was key to understanding a few interesting topics of the positive of choosing a different financial route out of one’s estate or other portfolios.

A lot of business school students come from religious backgrounds, and come up with a lot of different jokes and intelligent comments with this story. As many of us have family that has prepared for our financial path, we all find it normal for someone to have stocks or a trust fund. But from some religious childhoods, talking about a strategy with some thought of love, ethic, and prosperity sounds cool.

During old times and it still occurs in some economic fiduciary plans, relocating money or putting the money into stocks is a wise decision to build wealth for a nation, country, or even community. Rather than making liquidity a top priority, which is what we see in a lot of countries, investing the money into a program or stocks helps identify how the money is utilized. We, also, can observe how people appreciate it with their new jobs. Allowing the owner to get a better idea of the currency and circulation.

Often times, quick cash and deposits creates a lot of different opinions and emotions. We might notice odd levels of utopia, if we were to study it in economics. Our friends might want us to share, and the new friend at the local pub might increase the price of it’s famous local entree—Creating harsh economic conditions.

At the end of it, some analysts might observe that the evaluation report is similar for both situations. However, using your money for an optimistic and enthusiastic individual seems more professional. Had they known they both had the same amount of money, they’d probably notice they earned the same amount of economic money.

So is it all the same? A lot of academic theorists say, “No.” The person with the cash gift, might be better friends with the bar owner on Market Street, but the person with the portfolio experienced a lot of financial well-being. Trying to make logical and statistical decisions. Making it seem a lot more like school. Their Father is probably just as happy for all of them.

-------------------

“'We're Headed for a Family Feud': My Father Offered His 3 Kids Equal Monetary Gifts. My Siblings Took Cash. I Took Stock. It's Soared in Value - Now They're Crying Foul.” Google, Google, https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.marketwatch.com/amp/story/were-headed-for-a-family-feud-my-father-offered-his-3-kids-equal-monetary-gifts-my-siblings-took-cash-i-took-stock-its-soared-in-value-and-now-theyre-crying-foul-11648697565.